It's that time again. The debate is being broadcast live by all the usual suspects.
http://www.msnbc.com
http://www.nytimes.com
http://www.msnbc.com
http://www.nytimes.com
Comments 
It's that time again. The debate is being broadcast live by all the usual suspects.
http://www.msnbc.com http://www.nytimes.com Comments |
BIDEN DOMINATING!
I'm obviously biased, but Biden is going great guns in my view
Biden smirks in the cut aways I see, like a bear thinking about all the various ways he can effectively maim a bunny.
you should crosspost this to the front of sift talk, it's why I didn't see it...
OK.
I have to admit that she's not doing as poorly, (so far) as I expected. Much better than the Couric interviews. Debate camp must work.
Except that she's just veering things back onto her pre-learned scripts... but the problem is the most people won't notice that she's just doing that.
And lying through her teeth on a number of points.
Urgh
All Presidential debates need Quake Announcers.
BIDEN DOMINATING!
lmao! HEAD SHOT!!
oops - upvoted the wrong comment. That one's pretty good too, though.
I can't wait until they get into Foreign policy.
Better than looking for more oil, I grant you, but nooo, not 'clean coal'
Did war in Iraq start in 2007?
Government shouldn't be involved in marriage. Period.
But what they're talking about is the benefits given to long term couples. You MUST give the same benefits to those couples of either sex that are together in a committed relationship.
If religion wants to take the word 'marriage' and not let others have it ok... but don't suggest that the government shouldn't guarantee the rights of couples for welfare, rights, etc.
^agreed. I want to be able to marry my toaster.
And you should have a right to that if that's what you're into.
Ugh
>> ^blankfist:
Government shouldn't be involved in marriage. Period.
But what they're talking about is the benefits given to long term couples. You MUST give the same benefits to those couples of either sex that are together in a committed relationship.
If religion wants to take the word 'marriage' and not let others have it ok... but don't suggest that the government shouldn't guarantee the rights of couples for welfare, rights, etc.
I agree. And those benefits should be nothing if marriage is the criteria to qualify for them.
oooh, looks like the war... bugger
Do you think that the Jewish people are going to let that happen? Why Do we have to help, I think they are capable of defending themselves very well.
They have good martial arts Krav maga.
What the fuck is with this media narrative like the war in Iraq started in 2007 with the Surge? What about the 2003? 2004? 2005? OIF1 doesn't even count it seems.
Idiot
Good on Biden for attacking the point
I'd love to read her index cards, probably a hell of a study system.
Biden is expected to be great at this, she isn't.
She still sucks in a huge way, but people aren't really looking at her critically, they're just looking for a really embarrassing gaff, if she doesn't make one then she'll be seen as doing a great job.... JUST BECAUSE SHE MADE IT THROUGH.
Set the bar low and be amazed that she can step over it.
So sad.
...
Um...
Bridge to nowhere?
Anyone?
Anyone?
He's fucking Frodo on a quest to Mordor.
Oh, I know I'll move on to talking about bullshit 'he knows how to win a war'
Such crap
The surge cannot work in Afghanistan, its a different set of people and environment. Furthermore where are you going to get the troops from?
Canada anyone?
Self calling yourselves mavericks DOES NOT MAKE IT SO!
In a report on army times, they had a recent attack and loss of a fire base, below a high vantage point village.
The Taliban is actually attacking from Waziristan in full on offensives, they do not wanna give up the Opium trade.
F*CK OFF RELIGION FROM POLITICS